Reviewer storefront

EmberScope project review index

A single route through the public AAO feasibility package: mission case, optical evidence, detector and radiometry budgets, payload concept, software, validation, operating model, cost evidence, and decision history.

Mission & requirements

The study starts with the search problem and the recorded working assumptions.

Requirements closeout checklist

Open the closeout checklist to see which stakeholder assumptions had to be recorded before trace restart work could proceed.

Stakeholder answer pack

Open the answer pack for the target-area, altitude, payload-branch, airframe, and authority questions.

Evidence intake ledger

Open the evidence ledger for the advisory source-note status and remaining vendor or validation evidence gaps.

Optical design

The optical pages separate baseline geometry, measured failures, and restart targets.

Optics hub

Open the optics hub for the current reference prescription, caveats, and links to trace artifacts.

Verified CAD downloads

Open the CAD download centre for deterministic, source-hashed review packages and explicit manufacturing-maturity boundaries.

Optical evaluation

Open the evaluation stack for spot, ray-fan, detector-energy, vignetting, tolerance, and manufacturability screens.

Detector & radiometry

Detector choice and radiometric evidence are kept beside the optics.

Payload concept

The physical package is tracked as an instrument payload, not just an optical diagram.

Payload allocation

Open the payload concept for the 150 mm envelope, sub-2 kg allocation, power, thermal, mount, and serviceability assumptions.

Assembly and manufacturing guidance

Open the payload assembly guide for the numbered make/buy inventory, datum strategy, service sequence, inspection gates, and manufacturing-release gaps.

Software & pipeline

The detection workflow is documented from thermal frames to replayable alerts.

Onboard pipeline

Open the onboard pipeline for raw-frame intake, calibration state, geotagging, candidate detection, operator review, and exports.

Onboard compute

Open the compute-board trade for camera interfaces, raw-capture bandwidth, power, storage, timing, temperature, and the Gate-1 board recommendation.

End-to-end simulation

Open the end-to-end simulation for the combined target radiance, detector noise, optics, survey geometry, and false-positive rows.

Fire-camera merit metrics

Open the merit metrics for the camera-level scoring terms used to compare designs.

Calibration & validation

The evidence ladder keeps bench, dataset, and field claims distinct.

Field-test ladder

Open the field-test plan for bench checks, surrogate targets, flight routes, and controlled-burn boundaries.

Operations & fleet

The operating model ties camera performance to revisit and coverage.

Survey model

Open the survey model for altitude, speed, swath, overlap, dwell, route spacing, and revisit calculations.

Payload capability and coverage

Open the fleet coverage model for per-drone coverage and payload-cost rollups from the current optics assumptions.

Cost & procurement

Procurement pages remain research evidence, not an active vendor process.

Procurement path

Open the procurement plan for fabrication, assembly, quote gates, acceptance checks, and first-build allowances.

COTS payload screen

Open the COTS payload screen for product-level gates against target, coverage, raw-data, and quote-ceiling assumptions.

Process & decision history

Reviewers can inspect the file bundle, methodology, current summary, and daily work record.

Technical files

Open the technical files for prescriptions, manifests, geometry exports, source-of-truth files, and build-map artifacts.

Project risk register

Open the risk register for evidence-linked engineering risks, qualitative ratings, owners, and retirement paths.

Phase-gated roadmap

Open the roadmap for phase entry and exit evidence, the current chartered engineering position, and the AAO/RFS decision boundaries.

AI methodology and provenance

Open the methodology page for agent and human roles, revision and source-hash tracing, negative-result handling, and independent verification commands.

Questions Fable asked

Open the Fable review note for the recorded reframing question, its engineering consequence, and the boundary on what this one project observation establishes.