Use this page for the meeting
Choose one option or write a bounded replacement for each question, then record the accepting stakeholder.
RFS-011 answer pack - 2026-06-18
The closeout checklist names the open decisions. This page turns them into answer rows for target area, altitude, payload branch, airframe class, and sign-off authority.
Closeout state
The locked baseline has 4 decisions. The open side has 5 decisions, now mapped to recordable answer fields.
Choose one option or write a bounded replacement for each question, then record the accepting stakeholder.
Do not mark RFS-011 complete until the selected answers and the accepting stakeholder are recorded in project notes.
Answer record
| Field | Recorded value |
|---|---|
| Answered by | |
| Answer date | |
| Hourly target area | |
| Altitude basis | |
| Payload branch | |
| Airframe class | |
| Sign-off authority | |
| Evidence source |
Stakeholder questions
Question
What land block must one fleet revisit every hour in the first trial?
This is the missing input that turns per-drone coverage into fleet count and maximum affordable payload cost.
| Option | Answer to record | Evidence | Design consequence | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 250 ha first trial Evidence page | Hourly revisit target = 250 ha. | 2 payloads at 120 m with a USD 33k unit-cost ceiling, or 1 payload with a waiver and a USD 66k ceiling. | This is the least costly meaningful trial block and can fit one waiver-enabled custom payload or two cheaper 120 m payloads. | Use this if RFS wants a focused proof flight before scaling. |
| 500 ha planning case Evidence page | Hourly revisit target = 500 ha. | 3 payloads at 120 m with a USD 22k unit-cost ceiling, or 2 payloads with a waiver and a USD 33k ceiling. | This is the current central planning case; it makes altitude authorisation and unit-cost control decisive. | Use this if RFS wants a few-square-kilometre operational block. |
| 1000 ha stretch case Evidence page | Hourly revisit target = 1000 ha. | 6 payloads at 120 m with a USD 11k unit-cost ceiling, or 3 payloads with a waiver and a USD 22k ceiling. | This exceeds the current custom-payload budget envelope unless the payload becomes cheaper or the fleet budget changes. | Use this only if RFS accepts a budget or architecture change. |
Closeout test: Record one target area or a bounded first-trial range in hectares.
Question
Can the first survey case assume above-120 m operations?
The waiver case roughly doubles per-drone coverage and can remove one payload from the 500 ha planning case.
| Option | Answer to record | Evidence | Design consequence | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stay at 120 m Evidence page | Altitude basis = 120 m AGL cap. | The conservative model covers about 182 ha/h per payload. | Fleet count rises; the optics and payload branch must work within the most conservative operating envelope. | Keep procurement and optics gates tied to the 120 m rows. |
| Waiver path is realistic Evidence page | Altitude basis = above-120 m waiver case may be used. | The waiver model covers about 378 ha/h per payload. | Fewer payloads may cover the same block, but the optical design must still hold the 3 cm target gate at the higher altitude. | Ask RFS to name the trial altitude and authorisation path. |
Closeout test: Record whether the 120 m cap is binding or the waiver case is in scope.
Question
Should AAO quote COTS first, custom optics first, or both in parallel?
Fast 640-class COTS cameras now pass first-order physics, but only exact product data can prove raw radiometry, calibration access, mass, power, and cost.
| Option | Answer to record | Evidence | Design consequence | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quote COTS first Evidence page | Procurement branch = COTS quote gate before custom fabrication. | 45 deg 640-class radiometric camera reaches SNR 105.8; 69 deg 640-class mapping camera reaches SNR 38.4. | This can protect the AUD 100k fleet budget, but only if raw/pre-AGC frames and calibration state are accessible. | Request vendor evidence and quotes before ordering hardware. |
| Run COTS and custom in parallel Evidence page | Procurement branch = parallel COTS quote gate and custom optics maturation. | The custom reference reaches SNR 45.0, while fast 640-class COTS paths also clear the benchmark. | This preserves schedule optionality but spends effort on two paths until quotes and interface evidence arrive. | Use the same raw-data and calibration checklist for both paths. |
| Custom first Evidence page | Procurement branch = custom optics first. | The custom reference is the controlled design path; Lepton 3.1R SWaP floor is rejected at SNR 0.4, so not every cheap COTS path is viable. | This keeps optical ownership but probably limits the AUD 100k fleet to one or two payloads unless cost is reduced. | Restart prescription work only after EFL/FOV and F-number targets are fixed. |
Closeout test: Record one procurement branch and the product evidence required before spending.
Question
Is a 2 kg-capable fixed-wing or VTOL survey aircraft acceptable for the first payload?
The current payload boundary points to heavier survey aircraft; a smaller airframe would reopen payload mass, optics, and coverage assumptions.
| Option | Answer to record | Evidence | Design consequence | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 kg class accepted Evidence page | Airframe basis = 2 kg-capable fixed-wing or VTOL class is acceptable. | The fleet coverage model uses fixed-wing survey platforms and flags 2 kg payload support as a gating assumption. | The 150 mm / sub-2 kg custom path can remain in the design space. | Carry the current payload envelope into vendor and airframe conversations. |
| Must be lighter Evidence page | Airframe basis = first payload must fit a lighter drone class. | The COTS screen shows Lepton-class SWaP paths are too weak for the 3 cm target, so smaller is not automatically mission-capable. | The project must relax target, coverage, altitude, or payload ownership before the optics work can proceed honestly. | Define the actual mass, power, and volume ceiling before more prescription work. |
Closeout test: Record the accepted aircraft class or the replacement mass and power envelope.
Question
Who can accept the locked baseline and close RFS-011?
The site now has enough decision artifacts to close the interview, but the TODO must stay open until a stakeholder explicitly accepts the answers.
| Option | Answer to record | Evidence | Design consequence | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accept locked baseline Evidence page | Stakeholder accepts area-survey role, 3 cm char target, 640-class LWIR branch, 150 mm package, sub-2 kg payload, and AUD 100k payload budget. | These are the locked rows on the closeout checklist. | RFS-019 can restart toward a survey prescription instead of revisiting mission role and target class. | Record the name, date, and source note before marking RFS-011 complete. |
| Reopen one baseline item Evidence page | Stakeholder reopens one or more locked baseline decisions. | Any change to role, target class, detector branch, payload envelope, or budget changes the downstream optical target. | RFS-011 stays open and the derived coverage, COTS, and prescription pages must be rerun before prototype work. | Name the changed decision and rerun the affected decision artifacts. |
Closeout test: Record the accepting stakeholder, accepted baseline, and answer source.
Evidence links